4/19/2010

A Church Mary Can Love


A Church Mary Can Love

I heard a joke the other day about a pious soul who dies, goes to heaven, and gains an audience with the Virgin Mary. The visitor asks Mary why, for all her blessings, she always appears in paintings as a bit sad, a bit wistful: Is everything O.K.?

Mary reassures her visitor: “Oh, everything’s great. No problems. It’s just ... it’s just that we had always wanted a daughter.”

That story comes to mind as the Vatican wrestles with the consequences of a patriarchal premodern mind-set: scandal, cover-up and the clumsiest self-defense since Watergate. That’s what happens with old boys’ clubs.

It wasn’t inevitable that the Catholic Church would grow so addicted to male domination, celibacy and rigid hierarchies. Jesus himself focused on the needy rather than dogma, and went out of his way to engage women and treat them with respect.

The first-century church was inclusive and democratic, even including a proto-feminist wing and texts. The Gospel of Philip, a Gnostic text from the third century, declares of Mary Magdalene: “She is the one the Savior loved more than all the disciples.” Likewise, the Gospel of Mary (from the early second century) suggests that Jesus entrusted Mary Magdalene to instruct the disciples on his religious teachings.

St. Paul refers in Romans 16 to a first-century woman named Junia as prominent among the early apostles, and to a woman named Phoebe who served as a deacon. The Apostle Junia became a Christian before St. Paul did (chauvinist translators have sometimes rendered her name masculine, with no scholarly basis).

Yet over the ensuing centuries, the church reverted to strong patriarchal attitudes, while also becoming increasingly uncomfortable with sexuality. The shift may have come with the move from house churches, where women were naturally accepted, to more public gatherings.

The upshot is that proto-feminist texts were not included when the Bible was compiled (and were mostly lost until modern times). Tertullian, an early Christian leader, denounced women as “the gateway to the devil,” while a contemporary account reports that the great Origen of Alexandria took his piety a step further and castrated himself.

The Catholic Church still seems stuck today in that patriarchal rut. The same faith that was so pioneering that it had Junia as a female apostle way back in the first century can’t even have a woman as the lowliest parish priest. Female deacons, permitted for centuries, are banned today.

That old boys’ club in the Vatican became as self-absorbed as other old boys’ clubs, like Lehman Brothers, with similar results. And that is the reason the Vatican is floundering today.

But there’s more to the picture than that. In my travels around the world, I encounter two Catholic Churches. One is the rigid all-male Vatican hierarchy that seems out of touch when it bans condoms even among married couples where one partner is H.I.V.-positive. To me at least, this church — obsessed with dogma and rules and distracted from social justice — is a modern echo of the Pharisees whom Jesus criticized.

Yet there’s another Catholic Church as well, one I admire intensely. This is the grass-roots Catholic Church that does far more good in the world than it ever gets credit for. This is the church that supports extraordinary aid organizations like Catholic Relief Services and Caritas, saving lives every day, and that operates superb schools that provide needy children an escalator out of poverty.

This is the church of the nuns and priests in Congo, toiling in obscurity to feed and educate children. This is the church of the Brazilian priest fighting AIDS who told me that if he were pope, he would build a condom factory in the Vatican to save lives.

This is the church of the Maryknoll Sisters in Central America and the Cabrini Sisters in Africa. There’s a stereotype of nuns as stodgy Victorian traditionalists. I learned otherwise while hanging on for my life in a passenger seat as an American nun with a lead foot drove her jeep over ruts and through a creek in Swaziland to visit AIDS orphans. After a number of encounters like that, I’ve come to believe that the very coolest people in the world today may be nuns.

So when you read about the scandals, remember that the Vatican is not the same as the Catholic Church. Ordinary lepers, prostitutes and slum-dwellers may never see a cardinal, but they daily encounter a truly noble Catholic Church in the form of priests, nuns and lay workers toiling to make a difference.

It’s high time for the Vatican to take inspiration from that sublime — even divine — side of the Catholic Church, from those church workers whose magnificence lies not in their vestments, but in their selflessness. They’re enough to make the Virgin Mary smile....

Judaism has always had a visceral and passionate hatred for the person of Christ which cannot be compared with the usual inter-religious tensions or antagonisms. When a Christian passes near a Mosque or a Muslim passes near a Christian Church, they don't utter curses. A religious Jew does (or, at least, is supposed to). Believing that your religion is true does entail that you consider the other ones has false, but thinking that somebody is in error does not entail hatred for that person. You know - love the sinner, hate the sin kind of approach. But Jews have always hated Christians and Christianity with a special intensity. And that has nothing to do with the alleged Antisemitism of the Church. Yes, the Papacy doesn't have a long history of Antisemitism, and also the real, original, Christian Church of the Church Fathers, never had any signs of hatred towards Jews even when their religious beliefs were scorned and denounced. Anyway, that is a long topic. Can I recommend a book on this topic? Read this book which can only be found at B&N: http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Judaism-Discovered-from-Its-Own-Texts/Michael-Hoffman/e/9780970378453


.....
“The Holy Scriptures cannot be used to justify the return of Jews to Israel and the displacement of the Palestinians, to justify the occupation by Israel of Palestinian lands,” Monsignor Cyril Salim Bustros, Greek Melkite archbishop of Our Lady of the Annunciation in Boston, Massachusetts, and president of the “Commission for the Message,” said at Saturday’s Vatican press conference.

“We Christians cannot speak of the ‘promised land’ as an exclusive right for a privileged Jewish people. This promise was nullified by Christ. There is no longer a chosen people – all men and women of all countries have become the chosen people.

“Even if the head of the Israeli state is Jewish, the future is based on democracy....

The Silence is Deafening by Edgar J. Steele

The old adage has it that, when visiting a foreign country, to ascertain who really runs things, one need determine only who is spoken about in whispers, if at all. ...

Hate laws are a singularly Jewish invention being foisted upon an unsuspecting public, so as to preemptively remove the possibility of criticism of themselves. Often written by the ADL, the organization that lobbies for their adoption, state by state, the laws are designed to stifle dissent and speaking out. ...

.

ويحمل كتاب البابا الجديد " يسوع الناصري " حادثة صلب المسيح كما وردت في الإنجيل، ومطالبة سكان القدس بإنزال عقوبة الصلب به

ويعتبر البابا أن الإشارة في الإنجيل إلى أن الذين أصروا على الصلب هم "اليهود" لا يشير إلى كل الشعب اليهودي، بل إلى كهنة الهيكل، بل وحتى البعض منهم فقط، ولا يوجد رابط بين الإشارة القديمة وبين المعنى العرقي المميز لليهود اليوم.

ينبغي أن لاننسى أن اليهود المعاصرين للرب يسوع صرخوا بأعلى أصواتهم (خذه اصلبه دمه علينا وعلى أولادنا ) فلا يستطيع أحد أن يبرئهم من هذه الجريمة إلا صاحب العلاقة والتاريخ يشهد أنهم دفعوا وما يزالوا يدفعون
يسوع على الصليب قال:" اغفر لهم يا ابتاه لانهم لا يعرفون ماذا يفعلون" يسوع هو اختار ان يموت على الصليب ليفدي كل من يؤمن به من دينونة الخطيئة
J'attire l'attention de chaque chrétien que ceux qui ont crié crucifiez-le plusieurs fois c'est la foule des juifs qui étaient dehors en attendant le procès de la crucification?


http://lebaneseresistance.blogspot.com/

My photo
Disclaimer: the posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.