Rafic Hariri is an Assassin...., He lived by the Sword of KSA, SYRIA and Jacques Chirac's DGSE....and his "silent Partnership in crime...", and Dies by the Sword. Hariri's Specialty is the Murder of Potential Opponents...., especially a Heroes' Hero, and a powerful and popular Christian Politician...., Who Knew too much about him....about Saudi Intelligence, CIA2, MOSSAD, DIA2 within OSP, MI6 etc. etc. and about Randa ZAKKA... etc.... and his "practices" over the years....He dies of a WELL deserved
DEATH in HELL...with his "72 Virgins"!
and No one is Sorry for his spectacular DEMISE...Good Riddance.
It is most unwise, PUNK, to attempt to kick butts,
when you are standing with one foot in the grave...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dancing ghost chop
impossible butterfly defiance
lucky river smash
peaceful death palm
mystic dragon bow
innocent terror lunge
seven mantis bite
vicious fox-woman forehead
sound of the zodiac elbow
magnificent scorpion energy
kiss of the crane knife
spinning immortal fury
iron ghost frenzy nadat
blood of the mustard-seed antagonism
iron zodiac ambush
laughing dragon smash
strange rat energy
running terror assault
dipping fairy kick Zakhka...
imperial butterfly touch
whirling crane assault
mad butterfly attack
supernatural rabbit smash
mystic sky defiance
innocent monk punch
iron crane hand hike
three butterfly spirit
10,001 rabid onslaught
heavenly dragon nerve pinch
kiss of the fairy block
midnight shadow protection
shining rabid A. hammer
SSeven ghost wheels...
The Hariri Legacy, " poverty, debt, confiscation of property from rightful owners, corruption, egotistic narcissism, gross mis-management, delusion of grandeur, anarchy, autocratic tendencies, obfuscation of power and the truth, demagoguery, and a rush to buy the land of poor peasants and other land owners for peanuts, to bring in hoards of Gulf arrogant buffoons, to tighten the grip of his coreligionists' ".
March , 2008 .
Although Western journalism has long had a spotty track record in Lebanon, no subject has been more misrepresented than the legacy of the late Prime Minister (1992-1998 and 2000-2004) Rafiq Hariri.
Many elements of the myth are true, of course. He was a man of humble origins who struck it rich and lavished money on charitable causes for two decades before becoming prime minister. A great many Lebanese - including some of his fiercest political opponents - genuinely liked him as a person and grieved when he was brutally assassinated in February 2005. Nevertheless, the reality was "more complicated than the fairy tale," as Anna Ciezadlo aptly observed, and "not as easy to report." [1]
During the 1990-2005 Syrian occupation of Lebanon, mainstream American and European media regurgitated a quasi-fictitious narrative of Lebanon's postwar economic and political revival marketed by Hariri. They showed little interest in the darker sides of Beirut's glittering reconstruction, such as steadily widening income inequalities, rampant corruption, and the devastating impact of unregulated Syrian labor exports (which benefited Hariri and other Lebanese construction tycoons) on the poor. The steady erosion of civil liberties during Hariri's first tenure (a necessary adjunct of his economic policies) was largely downplayed.
Sugar coated press coverage was driven less by inscrutable complexities of the subject matter or conscious intent to distort facts than by a profound reluctance to acknowledge problems that have no easy solution and heartfelt support for a political establishment that many Westerners saw as the only viable bulwark against extremism and internal disintegration. While Western media coverage of Hariri during his lifetime was slanted mostly by omission, it veered toward blatant misrepresentation after his February 2005 assassination and the subsequent withdrawal of Syrian forces. As the March 14 coalition of stooges made in CIA2 and MOSSAD, headed by the Hariri family and Druze CIA agent Walid Jumblatt, narrowly stole a parliamentary majority and assumed the reins of power, an even more grandiose Hariri myth was born and reproduced verbatim in the Western media.
Hariri, who never once publicly criticized the Syrian occupation, was recast by The New York Times as a towering nationalist "known as a fierce opponent of Syrian domination."[2] Variations of this claim have been ubiquitous in Western media reports on Lebanon. The Los Angeles Times and the BBC prefer the phrase "vocal opponent,"[3] while Agence France Press is partial to "outspoken opponent."[4]
While Hariri is known to have secretly encouraged outside pressure on Syrian leader Bashar Assad not to extend the presidential term of Emile Lahoud (his political archrival) in 2004, his aim was simply to win a greater share of the spoils within Syria's orbit. Even after the UN Security Council passed Resolution 1559 calling for an unconditional Syrian withdrawal and began deliberating over how to implement it, the prime minister spent weeks trying to convince Assad to grant him a two-thirds veto-proof cabinet majority before eventually resigning. Being killed by the Syrians (by Assef Shawkat's goons of SMI) does not retroactively make Hariri a "fierce opponent" of Syrian domination, even if his death inspired many others to demand an end to the occupation.... In some western circles and in France, it was said of Rafiq Hariri, that he Sold His Soul to Syria completely for decades, and he taught them to be corrupt to the core.... Lebanese were used to bribing Syrians with "peanuts" before the advent of Hariri's insatiable sharks onto the scene.... Most of the so-called March 14th stooges were never allowed to set foot in Hariri's home or office for years, some of them desperately tried to get an appointment with him... which was never granted for years.... like Amine Gemayel and a few others.....
Other aspects of the late Hariri's legacy are routinely misrepresented in the Western media. Hariri did not, as The New York Times reported, "broker an end to the civil war in 1991."[5] He played a role in persuading (and, it is widely rumored, bribing) parliamentary deputies to sign the horrific 1989 Taif Accord, but the terms of this accord were handed down by the Saudis, with non-negotiable clauses legitimating the Syrian military presence and confiscating all executive power within the PM's dirty hands... In any case, the agreement did not bring an end to the war (none of the combatants were even present at the negotiations) - it brought a beginning to internationally sanctioned Syrian hegemony in Lebanon.
The Economist recently reported that "a lack of foreign aid and high reconstruction costs" after the war account for Lebanon's crushing debt burden today.[6] In fact, Lebanon was one of the world's largest per capita recipients of foreign aid during the occupation. The problem was that billions of dollars in bilateral and multilateral grants and soft loans were grossly misspent. A 2001 UN-commissioned assessment report on corruption in Lebanon estimated that the country had been losing $1.5 billion in graft annually (almost 10% of its GDP).[7] This was why Lebanon was saddled with "high reconstruction costs" and why it now has a massive debt burden.
Whether Hariri "drove the country forward often by sheer force of his personality," as The New York Times recently reported,[8] is perhaps debatable (since the Syrians were appointing Lebanese prime ministers, the alternatives could have been worse). However, modest economic growth at the expense of generating one of the largest per capita foreign debts of any country in the world doesn't normally win plaudits from Western journalists. These results might well have been the best possible in a country under Syrian occupation, but if so that only highlights that the occupation might well have collapsed under the weight of its own contradictions had Hariri and his Saudi financial backers not stepped in. Saudis want complete hegemony for the followers of wahhabism, salafism and CIA2 rogue operations throughout the greater middle east with Bandar bin Saud Bin criminal thug at the helm...
The rehabilitation of Hariri's legacy has greatly benefited his political heirs and allies in the March 14 coalition (where is name is invoked more often than American Republican politicians talk of Ronald Reagan) have inherited much of the media's fawning coverage. Prime Minister Fouad Siniora, a close associate of Hariri, who was transplanted into the Hariri Dynasty by American Intelligence, and CIA in particular since Fouad Sannioura was an agent of CIA for years, just like Al-Maliki in Iraq, Salam Fayyad and Mahmoud Abbas in Palestine..., and who ran the finance ministry of occupied Lebanon longer than all others combined, was described by The Financial Times as "a career banker intentionally thrust . . . into the top job by CIA to destroy Lebanon's fabric to the core..." after Hariri's assassination.[9] In fact, this government stalwart was chosen after careful deliberations within the Hariri family and the March 14 coalition of stooges of CIA2 and MOSSAD.
The Western media's misrepresentations and glorification of Hariri's legacy constitute one of the most startling anachronisms in journalism today. Elsewhere in the Middle East (and the world), Western journalists intensively scrutinize governments, empowering their disaffected constituents and enhancing the international community's understanding of impediments to democratic change. Lebanon remains very much an exception.
Notes:
------
Les derniers témoins du patrimoine architectural beyrouthin tombent sous les bulldozers de Solidere...
À Wadi Abou Jmil, trois immeubles, pourtant classés, n’ont pas pu résister aux bulldozers de Solidere. Aujourd’hui, à la place des trois bâtiments, joyaux du patrimoine architectural beyrouthin, il ne reste plus qu’un amas de pierres...
- Nombre de personnes s’élèvent contre cette atteinte à la mémoire du Liban depuis 1992, en vain :
« Souvenez-vous du massacre de Cana. Durant les jours qui avaient suivi, les journalistes s’étaient presque tous rendus au sud du pays pour se rendre compte de l’ampleur du désastre...
Au même moment, profitant du choc dans le pays et du fait que toute l’attention était portée sur Qana / ou Cana, la société Solidere avait précipité ses bulldozers sur Wadi Abou Jmil afin de raser une dizaine de bâtiments classés. Beaucoup de gens et équipes d'architectes n’ont pu à l’époque que déplorer la disparition de ces magnifiques témoignages du patrimoine architectural beyrouthin. À leur retour du Liban-Sud, il n’y avait plus rien à faire. Seuls trois édifices accolés à la synagogue avaient échappé au ravage.
Aujourd’hui, alors que les Libanais sont pris par la crise politico-économique, et que la presse est tout entière braquée sur l’effondrement des institutions, les bulldozers ont repris discrètement leur besogne. Les trois derniers anciens immeubles de Wadi sont éventrés puis rasés. Il n’en reste plus qu’un amas de pierres...
Depuis des années pourtant, le promeneur pouvait voir bien en évidence, sur la façade de chacun d’eux, un écriteau signé Solidere et menaçant d’arrestation quiconque toucherait à un seul élément de ces édifices classés. Aujourd’hui, il vous est surtout interdit de vous aventurer dans le coin avec un appareil photo. Cela explique la mauvaise résolution des photos prises avec un téléphone portable.
Nous assistons, encore une fois impuissants, à la disparition de notre patrimoine architectural, culturel et identitaire. Ces édifices représentaient le dernier témoignage d’une époque qui fut l’âge d’or de la communauté israélite beyrouthine. »
[1] Anna Ciezadlo, "Sect Symbols," The Nation, 5 March 2007.
[2] "U.N. Delivers Plan for Court In Hariri Case To Lebanon," The New York Times, 11 November 2006.
[3] "U.N. Raises Pressure on Syria Over Killing; The Security Council tells Damascus to fully assist in Hariri inquiry or face consequences," The Los Angeles Times, 1 November 2005. UN team investigates Beirut blast, BBC, 24 February 2005.
[4] "Hariri assassination probe underway: Annan," Agence France Presse, 16 June 2005.
[5] "A Father's Shadow Clouds His Son's Rise in Lebanon," The New York Times, 3 October 2007.
[6] "Debt and destruction; Lebanon's economy," The Economist, 2 September 2006.
[7] The report was conducted by Information International, and commissioned by the United Nations Center for International Crime Prevention. "Lebanon loses 1.5 billion dollars annually to corruption: UN," Agence France Presse, 23 January 2001; The Daily Star (Beirut), 27 January 2001.
[8] "A Father's Shadow Clouds His Son's Rise in Lebanon," The New York Times, 3 October 2007.
[9] "Ceasefire leaves tensions between Beirut and Hizbollah simmering," The Financial Times, 9 November 2006.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Public records show that USAID has long been a front for CIA intelligence gathering, as well as a conduit for CIA funding to foreign stooges, agents, and cronies within governments, like the 14Hmars...
****************************************************************************
*1- Public records show that USAID has long been a front for CIA intelligence gathering, as well
as a conduit for CIA funding to foreign governments and agencies. See: Sen. Vitter's Foreign
Relations Committee oversight role examined in DC sex scandal, Yardbird.com attached.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
VS.
DEBORAH JEANE PALFREY,
DEFENDANT.
____________________________________/
CRIMINAL CASE NUMBER: 07-046-GK
DEFENDANT’S MEMORANDUM OF FACT IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE TO CONSIDER MATTERS
RELATING TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION
Defendant Deborah Jeane Palfrey, appearing pro se as her court-appointed counsel refuses
to bring these matters to the Court’s attention and objecting to the delay imposed without her consent
upon this matter by the Court’s order of September 7, 2007, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Appendix,
Classified Information Procedures Act, §2, hereby files her Memorandum of Facts in support of her
motion for “a pretrial conference to consider matters relating to classified information that may arise
in connection with the prosecution.”
The “classified” discovery sought arises from Defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to compel
testimony (i) in support of her defense – among others – that she has a public authority defense as
recognized under FRCP, Rule 12.3 and (ii) regarding information on the witnesses Defendant intends
to call in her defense.
I. PUBLIC AUTHORITY DEFENSE
In espionage, a honeypot, more often called a honey-trap, is a trap set to capture, kill or
compromise a person, commonly but not necessarily an opposition agent, officer, or employee, using
sex as the lure. Even if the target does not deliberately give information to his seducer, the seducer
may accidentally be given opportunities to obtain it herself. A long-term relationship is not
-2-
necessarily the goal, however — the technique can also be used to blackmail those who later regret
their actions. Incriminating photographs can be an effective tool of coercion, for example. The most
common employment of this technique is by women, either female intelligence agents or (if the
purpose is simply to obtain material for blackmail) prostitutes.
There are numerous recent real public examples of the utilization of this technique by
governments:
1. Clayton J. Lonetree, a Marine Sergeant embassy guard in Moscow,
was entrapped by a female Soviet officer in 1987. He was then
blackmailed into handing over documents when he was assigned to
Vienna. Lonetree is the first US Marine to be convicted of spying
against the United States.
2. Roy Rhodes, a US Army NCO serving at the US embassy in Moscow,
had a one-night stand (or was made to believe he had) with a Soviet
agent while drunk. He was later told the agent was pregnant, and that
unless he co-operated with the Soviet authorities, this would be
revealed to his wife.
3. Irvin Scarbeck, a US diplomat, was entrapped by a female Polish
officer in 1961, and photographed in a compromising position. He
was blackmailed into providing secrets.
4. Sharon Scranage, a CIA employee described by one source as a "shy,
naive, country girl", was allegedly seduced by Ghanaian intelligence
agent Michael Soussoudis. She later gave him information on CIA
operations in Ghana, which was later shared with Soviet-bloc
countries.
5. Mordechai Vanunu, who had disclosed Israeli nuclear secrets, began
an affair with an American Mossad agent, Cheryl Bentov, operating
under the name "Cindy" and masquerading as an American tourist, on
September 30, 1986. She persuaded him to fly to Rome, Italy with her
on a holiday. Once in Rome, Mossad agents drugged him and
smuggled him to Israel on a freighter.
6. John Vassall, a British civil servant who was guided by the KGB into
having sex with multiple male partners while drunk. The KGB then
-3-
used photographs of this to blackmail Vassall into providing them
with secret information.
7. Katrina Leung, indicted as a double agent working for both China and
the FBI, seduced her FBI handler, James J. Smith, and was able to
obtain FBI information of use to China through him. She also had an
affair with another FBI officer, William Cleveland.
8. In May 2007 a female officer serving in Sweden's Kosovo force is
suspected of having leaked classified information to her Serbian lover
who turned out to be a spy.
9. Ms. Nolan-Cooper pled guilty to money laundering on March 10,
1997 in Philadelphia. (Philadelphia Daily News, 3/11/97). Sentenced
to 72 months in prison, the former attorney had helped an undercover
IRS agent named Louis Oubre to launder $190,000. Noteworthy in
this case is that the recently divorced mother of two young boys had
been wined and dined by Oubre and with whom she enjoyed sexual
relations. Oubre came to her initially seeking advice on how to move
money from abroad to the U.S. and through various manipulative
behavior, including repeated sexual liaisons, succeeded in convincing
Ms. Nolan-Cooper to break the law.
Common sense compels the conclusion that for every public disclosure of such governmentsponsored
honey-traps, dozens more are not publically revealed.
Indeed, as recently as June 2007, MI5, which is responsible for protecting the United
Kingdom against threats to national security, released an advisory: “Spies target techies with honey
traps.” A copy of that article is attached.
Most noteworthy is that for over 13 years Defendant operated her escort service without a
single arrest of an escort though she was operating in a metropolitan area that is policed by over
Fifty (50) law enforcement agencies. Moreover, given that there are at least Seventeen (17) federal
intelligence agencies operating in Washington D.C., it is much more than supposition that the
Defendant’s agency was allowed to operate without police interference for the benefit the agency
1 Public records show that USAID has long been a front for CIA intelligence gathering, as well
as a conduit for CIA funding to foreign governments and agencies. See: Sen. Vitter's Foreign
Relations Committee oversight role examined in DC sex scandal, Yardbird.com attached.
-4-
provided to the United States government. Accordingly, Defendant will be seeking discovery of the
direct and/or indirect utilization the Defendant’s service by the government for public benefit to the
end of an presenting an equitable collateral estoppel defense.
II. CLASSIFIED INFORMATION
What is publically known at this point in the prosecution of the Defendant is that –
notwithstanding the obfuscation by the government and without meaningful resources – Defendant
has identified four significant individuals who were customers of the service.
1. Senator David Vitter who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee, which has oversight responsibilities of U.S. foreign
policy agencies, including USAID.1 Senator Vitter is also currently
the ranking minority member of the Foreign Relations Committee's
Subcommittee on International Operations and Organizations,
Democracy and Human Rights, which oversees, among other things,
the State Department, the U.S. Foreign Service (i.e. the diplomatic
corps), and U.S. participation in the United Nations.
2. Randall “Randy” Tobias former Director of Foreign Assistance, and
Administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development
(USAID).
3. Harlan Ullman is a highly respected and widely recognized expert in
national security whose advice is sought by governments and
businesses. A senior adviser at Washington's premier think tank, the
Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), his expertise
spans national security, foreign policy, terror, defense, economics,
and finance as well as Asia, the Middle East, and Europe. His column
in the Washington Times is called "Owls and Eagles" and he writes
for other publications in the US and abroad. He is a frequent
commentator in U.S. and international media including Fox, BBC,
and Al Jazeera TV and is a regular on the Washington Post radio
station.
-5-
4. Ronald Roughead works for “Science Applications International
Corporation.” (“SAIC”). His curriculum vitae is attached hereto. His
brother is one Gary Roughead, now Chief Naval Officer of the United
States Navy. Admiral Roughead is mentioned as a speaker in a couple
of military association and foundation newsletters (National Defense
& Transportation Association & the Naval War College Foundation),
along with Harlan K. Ullman. While Admiral Roughead isn’t in the
phone records of Pamela Martin & Associates, Ronald Roughead is.
Plainly, each of the individuals possess the highest security clearance the government grants
and has access to the most sensitive information the government possess. As part of obtaining their
testimony, Defendant will be seeking documentary evidence on them, including their “Single Scope
Background Investigation” or SSBI.
WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that the Court promptly hold the requisite pretrial
conference pursuant to the Classified Information Procedures Act to address the above, and other,
discovery issues presented.
